Despite complaints, House passes insider-trading ban 417-2

STOCK Act does not include measure that would regulate those who sell 'political intelligence' to Wall Street, upsetting Democrats and some Republicans. Senate insider-trading ban passed last week with the provision. 

|
Jose Luis Magana/AP/File
Sen. Charles Grassley (R) of Iowa, shown here in a 2009 file photo on Capitol Hill in Washington, expressed extreme disappointment that House Republicans dropped in their version of the insider-trading ban his provision regulating those who sell 'political intelligence' to Wall Street.

The U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a bill to curb insider trading by lawmakers and other government officials on Thursday, despite objections from Democrats and some Republicans that it lacked some tough measures to fight corruption.

The House voted 417-2 to pass the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, even though it did not include a provision to impose new regulations on Washington insiders who collect "political intelligence" from lawmakers and sell it to Wall Street.

The Senate version passed last week included this proposal, and other measures to combat public corruption that were dropped from the bill by Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

Democrats vowed to restore these provisions when House and Senate members hash out the two bills' differences. Both chambers then must give final approval to the measure before it is sent to President Barack Obama, who has promised a swift signature.

The clean-government bill has attracted massive support during an election year in which Congress's approval ratings have been devastated by deadlocks over extending payroll tax cuts and spending measures that have nearly shut down the government in recent months.

But even a feel-good bill aimed at reaffirming the public's trust in Congress has sparked bickering over changes made by House Republicans.

Many Democrats seized upon comments by Republican Senator Charles Grassley that it was "astonishing and extremely disappointing" that the House dropped his provision to force registration of political intelligence operatives, who glean information about pending legislation from lawmakers and their staffs.

They accused Cantor of caving in to Wall Street interests by merely ordering a study of the sector.

"We are missing a large gap by leaving out the provision on political intelligence -- $100 million industry," said Democratic Representative Sheila Jackson Lee. "Yes we're going to support this legislation, but we can't get to conference soon enough to make this bill comparable and ready for the American people."

Cantor argued that the provision was too broad and its implications for civil liberties needed further study. And he said the overwhelming approval vote vindicated his approach to "improve and strengthen" the bill.

The House bill also inserted a provision to explicitly bar lawmakers and officials in federal agencies and independent regulatory bodies from gaining preferential access to initial public stock offerings.

Republicans dubbed this the "Pelosi provision," a reference to a CBS "60 Minutes" report about the husband of House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi buying shares in Visa Inc's 2008 IPO as tougher credit card regulations were pending before Congress. Pelosi, who has denied any special access or conflict of interest, said she supported the provision.

The core portion of both the House and Senate bills require lawmakers and higher level Obama administration and agency officials to disclose their stock trades within 30 days. It also clarifies that they are subject to the same Securities and Exchange Commission rules that prohibit trading on non-public, or "insider," information.

But the House version also left out a Senate provision aimed at combating public corruption that would give more powers to prosecutors to pursue public corruption cases and ban all gifts to public officials valued over $1,000.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Despite complaints, House passes insider-trading ban 417-2
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0209/Despite-complaints-House-passes-insider-trading-ban-417-2
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe