Bank of America ordered to pay nearly $800 million for illegal credit card practices

Bank of America was ordered by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to refund $727 million to consumers who were deceived by the bank's marketing of credit card payment protection programs, along with other fines. This makes Bank of America the fifth major credit card issuer to be fined for such behavior. 

|
Mike Blake/Reuters/File
A Bank of America sign in Encinitas, Calif. Bank of America agreed to pay nearly $800 million in fines and restitution to settle allegations of deceptive marketing and unfair billing involving credit card products, US regulators said on Wednesday, April 9, 2014.

Today, Bank of America was ordered by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to refund $727 million to consumers who were deceived by the bank's marketing of credit card payment protection programs and others who were charged for credit monitoring services they never fully authorized. This makes the bank the fifth major credit card issuer to be financially penalized for these types of credit card practices.
 
 In addition to the refunds, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency fined Bank of America $25 million in civil penalties for unfair billing practices. The bank also has to pay $20 million to the CFPB Civil Penalty Fund.

 The CFPB issued a consent order that showed over 1.4 million consumers were deceived by the marketing of two credit card payment protection programs. These products, called "Credit Protection Plus" and "Credit Protection Deluxe," allowed customers to request the bank cancel some credit card debt in the event of certain hardships like disability and involuntary unemployment, or certain life events such as retirement or entering college.  The CFPB found that the telemarketing practices used in selling these products were misleading. This took place between 2010 and 2012.
 
 Bank of America must provide approximately $268 million in refunds to the more than 1.4 million customers affected by these deceptive marketing practices.
 
 In addition, Bank of America enrolled consumers in programs to monitor their credit and alert them to potentially fraudulent activity. These programs were known as "Privacy Guard," "Privacy Source," and "Privacy Assist." The bank began charging customers fees and interest without or before they received proper authorization from consumers.
 
 Bank of America must pay $459 million to roughly 1.9 million customer accounts, representing approximately 1.5 million consumers who enrolled in the credit monitoring products and were charged while the bank did not perform all of the promised services.

 
 "We have consistently warned companies about illegal practices related to credit card add-on products," said CFPB Director Richard Cordray in a statement. "Bank of America both deceived consumers and unfairly billed consumers for services not performed. We will not tolerate such practices and will continue to be vigilant in our pursuit of companies who wrong consumers in this market."

Federal regulators have been cracking down on deceptive credit card practices and marketing from many of the biggest card issuers in the United States in recent years.

In September 2013, the Bureau ordered JPMorgan Chase to refund $309 million to credit card customers that were improperly billed for add-on products. The CFPB and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency concluded that 2.1 million cardholders were billed for services they never received. These add-on products included identity theft protection and fraud monitoring. Chase charged monthly fees ranging from $7.99 to $11.99. The investigation found that the company even charged customers for these services before the customers gave any authorization.
 
 In October 2012, American Express was ordered to refund $85 million to 
 customers and pay $27.5 million in civil penalties to settle regulators' accusations that the company violated a number of consumer protection laws. The issuer led customers to believe they would receive $300 for signing up for the Blue Sky credit card. The customers who fulfilled the conditions of the offer never received the money. In addition, American Express was accused of making false statements to persuade customers to pay off their credit card balances. The regulators said customers were told that if they agreed to pay off part of their debt, the remaining portion of the balance would be forgiven.
 
 In September 2012, the CFPB and the FDIC announced that Discover had to refund $200 million to their credit card customers for pressuring cardholders into buying expensive payment protection and credit monitoring services. Discover also had to pay a $14 million fine.
 
 In July 2012, Capital One agreed to pay up to $150 million to two million consumers as a result of the bank's telemarketers deceptively pushing credit monitoring and payment protection services. In addition, Capital One agreed to pay fines of $25 million to the CFPB and $35 million to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

 – Bill Hardekopf is founder of Lowcards.com, an online credit-card information site.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Bank of America ordered to pay nearly $800 million for illegal credit card practices
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Saving-Money/2014/0409/Bank-of-America-ordered-to-pay-nearly-800-million-for-illegal-credit-card-practices
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe