Hurricanes have been strengthening – like Beryl. Some scientists propose a Category 6.

|
Marta Lavandier/AP
Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) speaks on hurricane preparedness May 29, 2024, at a lumber and hardware store in Hialeah, Florida.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

The 2024 U.S. hurricane season, now underway, is predicted to be among the worst in decades. Before the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration made that forecast, a debate had been swirling about whether new vocabulary is needed to reflect the growing intensity of storms.

Category 5, signifying sustained winds stronger than 156 mph, is the highest marker on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale. Many Americans know the categories from weather reports and use them to decide how to prepare for storms.

Why We Wrote This

Hurricane season in the United States has begun. Given the growing intensity of storms, a debate has been swirling about whether a new category is needed on the Saffir-Simpson scale.

But in the past decade, the sustained wind speeds of eight hurricanes impacting the United States have surpassed 156 mph, killing 133 people and causing roughly $77 billion in damage. In recent months, some scientists have asked whether it’s time to add a Category 6 to the scale.

The big question is whether such a change would help save lives. Suzana Camargo of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory sees potential. “In terms of communicating risk and having people change their behavior, it might work,” she says.

The 2024 U.S. hurricane season, now underway, is predicted to be among the worst in decades. Before the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration made that forecast, a debate had been swirling about whether new vocabulary is needed to reflect the growing intensity of storms.

Category 5, signifying sustained winds stronger than 156 mph, is the highest marker on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale. Currently Hurricane Beryl is churning through the Caribbean and is the earliest Atlantic hurricane on record to reach Category 5 strength. The storm, recently downgraded to Category 4, is expected to pass on a path near Jamaica on Wednesday and then move on toward the Cayman Islands and Mexico on Thursday. 

Many Americans know the categories from weather reports and use them to decide how to prepare for storms. But in the past decade, the sustained wind speeds of eight hurricanes impacting the United States have surpassed 156 mph, killing 133 people and causing roughly $77 billion in damage. In recent months, some scientists have asked whether it’s time to add a Category 6 to the scale.

Why We Wrote This

Hurricane season in the United States has begun. Given the growing intensity of storms, a debate has been swirling about whether a new category is needed on the Saffir-Simpson scale.

How did the five-step scale come about?

In 1969, American civil engineer Herbert Saffir was conducting research for the United Nations on how to prevent hurricane damage in low-income, storm-prone areas and saw there was no standard system to quantify the likely damage from hurricanes with winds above 74 mph. Mr. Saffir soon collaborated with National Hurricane Center (NHC) director Robert Simpson to release the Hurricane Disaster-Potential Scale.

In a 1974 article for the Weatherwise journal, Mr. Saffir and Mr. Simpson remarked that their wind-focused scale “gives probable property damage and evacuation recommendations.” Category 1 storms, they wrote, bring “damage primarily to shrubbery, trees, foliage and unanchored mobile homes,” and Category 5 storms are marked by “shrubs and trees blown down” and “complete failure of roofs on many residences and industrial buildings.”

Neil Frank, Mr. Simpson’s successor at the NHC, made it an official NHC metric. It eventually was renamed the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale and is used today to categorize storms in the Atlantic basin and parts of the Pacific Ocean.

Why are some scientists proposing a Category 6?

Michael Wehner, of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and James Kossin, of the climate nonprofit First Street Foundation, have published a paper proposing a Category 6 that might better warn people of the risk from severe storms. While not outright advocating for a change yet, Dr. Wehner and Dr. Kossin state that a hypothetical Category 6 would give more room in the Saffir-Simpson scale for hurricanes growing in size and strength. 

After all, there’s a big difference between Hurricane Patricia, which grew in strength to 215 mph in 2015, and Hurricane Lee, which reached peak intensity at 160 mph last September. On the Saffir-Simpson scale, both were classified as Category 5.

In Dr. Wehner and Dr. Kossin’s new classification, Category 5 hurricanes would register sustained wind speeds between 157 and 192 mph. Category 6 hurricanes would be those exceeding 192 mph. 

Suzana Camargo of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory notes that “in terms of communicating risk and having people change their behavior, it might work.”

What are some other limitations of the scale? 

In the past decade or so, many scientists realized the scale’s categories didn’t always explain the severity of storms, says Dr. Camargo. She adds that many hurricane deaths are due to storm surge and flooding from rain – metrics excluded in the scale. The scale also doesn’t take into account tornadoes spawned by the storms.

Hurricane Harvey in 2017 is one example of how the scale might fall short, says James Marshall Shepherd of the University of Georgia’s Department of Meteorology. In its early days, that storm brought severe rain to Texas. Yet on the Saffir-Simpson scale, the risk categorization at the time wasn’t even a 1. Dr. Shepherd notes that the storm nevertheless had devastating effects such as power outages before spinning into a Category 4 hurricane. 

Dr. Camargo says remnants of Hurricane Ida in 2021 had significant impacts on New York due to flooding and storm surge, not sustained winds. “There have been suggestions of different scales that proposed to integrate the risk of rain, the risk of storm surge, the risk together with the wind,” she says. “If you’re going to change the scale, I would think that ... would be a better way to do it.”

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Hurricanes have been strengthening – like Beryl. Some scientists propose a Category 6.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2024/0702/hurricane-beryl-path-saffir-simpson-scale
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe