Flappy Bird flies away at height of its popularity

What's behind Dong Nguyen's decision to pull his immensely popular game, Flappy Bird, from app stores when it was pulling down $50,000 of revenue per day?

|
Dot Gears
Flappy Bird has a distinctly retro look.

Most app creators would be thrilled to find their game dominating both major US app stores and making $50,000 per day in advertising revenues.

But for Dong Nguyen, Vietnamese game developer and creator of the explosively popular Flappy Bird, the personal price wasn’t worth the profit.

On Saturday, Feb. 8, Mr. Nguyen posted on Twitter that he had enough.

“I am sorry 'Flappy Bird' users, 22 hours from now, I will take 'Flappy Bird' down,” he tweeted. “I cannot take this anymore.”

By Sunday, the game was gone from both the Android and Apple app stores.

Supposedly, so ends one of the stranger sagas in video-game and mobile-app history, though for fans of the game, countless questions remain. Did Nguyen really take the game down because of personal toll? Did the prospect of legal issues with Nintendo, as well as Vietnam’s recently tightened Internet laws, seem too daunting to continue? Or is it all just a marketing tactic to keep the spotlight on Nguyen and drive anticipation for his next game?

We’ll get to those questions, but first for the 45 percent of Americans without smart phones, let's take a look at the game behind the headlines.

Flappy Bird is nothing special, technically speaking, but many believe that is the reason for its success. In this free game, players navigate a small yellow bird with comically large eyes and orange beak though a 2-D field of traitorous pipes. If you touch a pipe: Game over. Though it sounds simple, the game is incredibly difficult, prompting online lists such as “10 things I’ve done since I downloaded Flappy Bird.” (“Swear” is one of the top things.) Some say this contributed to the addictive nature of the game, which seems to displease Nguyen.

“People are overusing my app :-(" he tweeted on Feb. 8 in response to the online list mentioned above.

It also seems that Nguyen was disenchanted with the sudden success of the game. Later on Feb. 8, he tweeted, “I can call 'Flappy Bird' is a success of mine. But it also ruins my simple life. So now I hate it.”

Some 12 hours later, Nguyen announced he would be taking the game down.

What happened?

Here are a few things to consider. Nguyen works with Vietnamese indie gamemaker dotGears. Though the gaming company has seen moderate success, it has never had a runaway hit like Flappy Bird. However, while rival free-to-play game Candy Crush has the multimillion-dollar resources of gaming company King behind it, dotGears is a self-described “small, independent” game developer. Keeping up with the demands of a game gone viral is no easy feat.

Nguyen also told The Verge in an interview that he was making $50,000 per day in advertising revenues. And $50,000 is 200 times the amount of the average Vietnamese monthly salary, according to Time. A sudden influx of wealth, and all the difficulties that can come from it, may not seem worth the profit.

And then there are the legal complications. Rumors quickly sprung up that Nintendo had sent a warning letter to Nguyen about the close resemblance between the simplistic graphics of Flappy Bird and early Super Mario games, but Nguyen and Nintendo both commented that this was only a rumor.

Let's not forget the issue of the Internet in Vietnam. In September, the country passed a stringent Internet censorship bill that discouraged free speech online and required foreign Internet companies to host at least one server on Vietnamese soil. Some worried that the huge amount of revenue stemming from US app stores could have triggered a backlash through this particular law. So far, it doesn’t look as if that is the case, according to local law experts.

“Local Internet regulations do not specifically prohibit a local developer, such as Dong Nguyen, from providing his online game to an off-shore entity like Apple, unless the game contains illegal information or Dong Nguyen fails to comply with other local regulations,” says Tran Manh Hung, lawyer at a Hanoi-based law firm specializing in intellectual property and technology issues to The Wall Street Journal.

Despite all this, the media hasn’t heard much from Nguyen aside from his tweets, and he has been silent on the social media site since Saturday. Could this mean it was all a stunt? Or is Nguyen just gearing up for a sequel to the addictive Flappy Bird? His last tweet reads: “And I still make games.”

BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones points out that whatever the reason, Nguyen has reached a level of notoriety that will no doubt drum up support for his next gaming venture.

“Maybe the main lesson we should learn from Flappy Bird is that we have seen the birth of a marketing genius,” he writes. “By killing the golden goose so quickly, Dong Nguyen has ensured that a huge audience will be waiting with breathless anticipation for his next game. And if that doesn't work, he can always allow Flappy Bird to fly again.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Flappy Bird flies away at height of its popularity
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2014/0210/Flappy-Bird-flies-away-at-height-of-its-popularity
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe