Yes, Chalamet can sing. But can ‘A Complete Unknown’ capture Bob Dylan?

|
Macall Polay/Searchlight Pictures
Pete Seeger (Edward Norton, left) and Bob Dylan (Timothée Chalamet) make music in “A Complete Unknown,” opening Christmas Day.

Biopics about music icons occupy a long and occasionally honorable place in the movies. Most recently Maria Callas, Elton John, Freddie Mercury, Leonard Bernstein, Amy Winehouse, and Elvis Presley got the treatment. Jeremy Allen White is set to play Bruce Springsteen.

Now we have Timothée Chalamet as Bob Dylan in “A Complete Unknown.” Directed by James Mangold, who co-wrote the script with Jay Cocks, the film is not so much a demystification of Dylan as it is a confirmation of his mystique. The film’s title is all too descriptive.

Mangold confines the action to between 1961 and 1965, beginning with the 19-year-old Dylan arriving in New York, guitar slung over his shoulder, and culminating in his infamous appearance at the Newport Folk Festival. Playing an electric guitar, rather than his usual acoustic, he outraged many of the event’s folkies and organizers, who accused him of selling out.

Why We Wrote This

The filmmakers of “A Complete Unknown” were faced with a daunting task, our critic writes: How do you get behind the mask of a willfully enigmatic artist like Bob Dylan?

It was fairly obvious, even at the time, that some sort of watershed cultural moment had occurred. As Elijah Wald wrote in his first-rate book “Dylan Goes Electric!” which the film draws heavily on, “What happened [at] Newport in 1965 was not just a musical disagreement or a single artist breaking with his past. It marked the end of the folk revival as a mass movement and the birth of rock as the mature artistic voice of a generation.”

This is an important story, which is not to say that “A Complete Unknown” is an important movie. The soundtrack, of course, is marvelous. (Chalamet acceptably subs for Dylan’s voice.) But I mostly connected to this film not because it contained anything revelatory, but because its history meshed with my own. It turned into a nostalgia trip, complete with great period recreations of 1960s Greenwich Village. I suspect many others who grew up with Dylan will react the same way. For those who didn’t experience this era in real time, Chalamet’s presence – his youthful movie star aura – may be enough to carry the film.

But the filmmakers have set themselves a near insoluble task: How do you get behind the mask of a willfully enigmatic artist like Dylan? For the most part, they duck the attempt.

To its credit, at least the movie doesn’t try to sugarcoat Dylan, whose reputation was never all that warm and fuzzy anyway. He is portrayed throughout as a careerist and a cad. His relationships with women are not pretty. Topping the list of cast-offs is folk goddess Joan Baez (well played by Monica Barbaro, who also does her own singing) and the artist-activist Sylvie Russo, Dylan’s first serious girlfriend. (She is played by Elle Fanning, and based on the real-life Suze Rotolo.) Dylan disparages Baez’s music as “like an oil painting in the dentist’s office.” Russo, often teary-eyed at his disloyalties, tells him at long last, “I don’t know you.”

She’s not alone. Nobody else in the film really does, either. And that’s the way Dylan wants it. Born Bobby Zimmerman, the middle-class Jewish kid from northern Minnesota purposefully exhibits few traces from his past. His real historical connection is to the music he loved while growing up. The most touching scene in the movie is right at the beginning, when Dylan visits his folk idol, Woody Guthrie (Scoot McNairy), in the New Jersey hospital where Guthrie is dying and unable to speak. Dylan plays Guthrie a song he wrote for him.

Present also in this scene is the film’s other major figure, Pete Seeger (a convincing Edward Norton), the icon who brought Dylan into the folk scene and championed his career until they unceremoniously split at the Newport event. Seeger, a founder of the festival, was a traditionalist. For him, folk music was a way of bringing people together in order to rally progressive causes.

Dylan deflected that role. He may have banded together a generation, but he was never a joiner. For him, the personal always eclipsed the political. I wish Mangold had not simplified the Seeger-Dylan rift. Seeger comes across at times like the genial Mister Rogers of the folk scene, while Dylan is its Marlon Brando. Mangold had an easier time of it when he made the Johnny Cash biopic “Walk the Line,” but Dylan is a far more complicated character than Cash. What may have begun as a descent into the personal depths of an enigmatic genius ends up as one more cog in the Bob Dylan myth machine.

Peter Rainer is the Monitor’s film critic. “A Complete Unknown” opens in theaters Dec. 25. It is rated R for language.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Yes, Chalamet can sing. But can ‘A Complete Unknown’ capture Bob Dylan?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2024/1220/bob-dylan-a-complete-unknown-timothee-chalamet
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe