Secret Service scandal now involves US military, prompts investigations

Secret Service agents and US military members are being investigated for alleged involvement with prostitutes in Cartagena, Colombia, site of the 33-nation Summit of the Americas conference.

|
Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
President Barack Obama walks with Secret Service agents to greet well wishers upon his arrival in Tampa, Florida, on his way to the Summit of the Americas in Colombia.

So far at least, the episode involving US Secret Service agents and prostitutes at a summit meeting in Cartagena, Colombia, seems to be no more than an embarrassment for an organization whose image is buttoned-down and highly professional, filled with stern-looking men willing to “take a bullet” for the president and other high-ranking officials.

While details remain sketchy, agency and White House officials insist that no security breaches occurred nor has the situation interfered with President Obama’s work at the 33-nation Summit of the Americas conference.

“Our focus here and the president’s focus continues to be on the meetings he’s having,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters covering the meeting. "The president does have full confidence in the United States Secret Service.”

How much do you know about the US Constitution? A quiz.

Still, more details have emerged, including the apparent involvement in inappropriate behavior of several US military members, five of whom have been confined to quarters in Colombia.

Gen. Douglas Fraser, commander of U.S. Southern Command, said he was "disappointed by the entire incident" and said the behavior was "not in keeping with the professional standards expected of members of the United States military."

What’s known at this point is that 11 Secret Service agents (including two supervisors), part of an advance team (not the president’s security detail), were placed on administrative leave and flown back to the United States on Friday, before President Obama arrived the same day.

“The nature of the allegations, coupled with a zero tolerance policy on personal misconduct, resulted in the Secret Service taking the decisive action to relieve these individuals of their assignment,” Secret Service Assistant Director Paul Morrissey said in a statement. “The personnel involved were brought to Secret Service Headquarters in Washington, D.C., for interviews [Saturday]. These interviews have been completed.”

While Secret Service and Southern Command officials have yet to talk about what transpired, US Rep. Peter King (R) of New York, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, said most of the 11 agents had brought women “presumed to be prostitutes” to their hotel rooms.

Rep. King said he will instruct his staff to do an investigation “to see if this is symptomatic of the Secret Service,” Politico reported.

“I don’t believe it is,” King said. “I have great regard for them. [Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan] moved very quickly on this, very quickly, very effectively.”

But, he added, “it definitely could have compromised the security of the president” by opening the agents to threats of blackmail.

Ronald Kessler, a former Washington Post reporter and author of the book “In the President’s Secret Service: Behind the Scenes With Agents in the Line of Fire and the Presidents They Protect,” called the incident “the biggest scandal in Secret Service history.”

“It is all part of this pattern that I wrote about in the book of corner cutting, laxness, cover up,” Kessler said in an interview with Politico.

King said: “If this is the worst [scandal] they have, this is a pretty good agency.”

Prostitution is legal in parts of Colombia, but not condoned by the Secret Service or the US military. In this case, according to several reports, a dispute arose over payment to one woman. This got hotel and local police officials involved, which then resulted in a report to the US Embassy.

In this case, a senior US official told the New York Times, “There are people who willingly went to prostitutes and other people who ended up with prostitutes.”

“Either way, it’s just unacceptable,” the official said.

How much do you know about the US Constitution? A quiz.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Secret Service scandal now involves US military, prompts investigations
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0415/Secret-Service-scandal-now-involves-US-military-prompts-investigations
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe