Harris vs. Trump: Where they stand on the big issues

Voters say it’s hard to know what’s true about the presidential race. Here’s a summary of proposals on key issues from Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.

|
AP
Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris (left photo) speaks at a campaign rally in Kalamazoo, Michigan, and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks at a rally in Greensboro, North Carolina.

As the presidential race enters the critical final phase before Election Day, the candidates are mobilizing their last blitz of podcast interviews, political ads, and get-out-the vote efforts.

The majority of voters, meanwhile, are worried about the election. And 52% of Americans say it’s “difficult to determine what is true and what is not” about the candidates and their campaigns when following news coverage, according to Pew Research Center.

To help readers understand Vice President Kamala Harris’ and former President Donald Trump’s positions on key topics, this article and a related series are examining “Harris vs. Trump: Where they stand on the issues.”

From economy to immigration, the summary of our series is below, with links from each topic to the longer story about each issue.

Rebecca Blackwell/AP
People take pictures of the bus at the start of the "Reproductive Freedom Bus Tour" by the Kamala Harris campaign, in Boynton Beach, Florida, Sept. 3, 2024.

Abortion

Access to abortion is one of the hottest topics in the 2024 election – the first presidential contest since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022.

  • Former President Trump celebrated the end of the half-century Roe era, and took credit for appointing three justices who helped remove the nationwide right to abortion. But in his 2024 campaign he has tried to indicate he’s not an absolutist. He recently said he would veto a potential federal abortion ban, “because it is up to the states to decide based on the will of their voters” and that restrictions on abortion should include “exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother.”
  • Vice President Harris has been a strong supporter of abortion rights throughout her political career. She is focused primarily on hewing a legislative path to restoring nationwide abortion rights, with a bill “codifying Roe,” or guaranteeing a right to abortion up to fetal viability.

Read the full story by Linda Feldmann: Abortion to IVF: Where Harris and Trump stand on reproductive issues

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
Vice President Kamala Harris applauds as she departs a campaign event in Pittsburgh. With the economy topping the list of voter concerns, Ms. Harris pledges to keep low tax rates in place for all but the highest-income Americans.

Economy

In some ways the candidates’ plans are similar. Both pledge to keep taxes low for the vast majority of Americans. Both favor efforts to produce more goods at home rather than importing them. And in pursuing their policies, both largely ignore an ever-rising national debt. But they have big differences, too.

  • Ms. Harris says that, with the 2017 Trump tax cuts set to expire, she won’t raise taxes on personal incomes below $400,000. But she calls for a tax hike for corporations and high-income Americans. In her plan the top personal income tax rate would rise from 37% to 39.6%; a new tax would hit unrealized capital gains of the ultra rich. She also seeks to expand the the child tax credit, and to create an “America Forward tax credit” to invest in strategic industries. Ms. Harris has promised to respect the Federal Reserve’s independence to set monetary policy.
  • Mr. Trump has said he wants to impose a 60% tariff on all Chinese imports and a 10% to 20% tariff on imports from everywhere else to boost U.S. manufacturing jobs. He aims to extend his expiring tax cuts from 2017, and to cut corporate taxes on domestic production. His promise to deport unauthorized immigrants would reduce the overall number of workers and consumers in the economy. Mr. Trump has also said that he thinks the U.S. president should have some say on how the Fed sets interest rates.

Read the full story by Laurent Belsie: Harris and Trump spar over economic impact of taxes and tariffs

John Amis/AP
Electric power lines are seen near Nashville, Tennessee. The U.S. presidential candidates differ sharply on whether to rely on fossil fuels or on renewable sources.

Energy and climate change

Both candidates paint a future with abundant energy. While differing on which energy sources they support, for instance, both have said they want it to be easier for energy companies to get approval for new infrastructure.

  • Ms. Harris puts her focus on developing what many experts see as the next generation of energy – wind, solar, and other renewables. She recently promised that she would “confront the climate crisis with bold action,” and a major priority would likely be to continue the major clean energy investments funded by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
  • Mr. Trump is a big booster of fossil fuels – the coal, oil, and gas that have long formed the base of the U.S. energy economy. He has said he would withdraw the United States from the world’s main climate agreement. Support could diminish for regulations focused on climate change – and for the federal agencies involved in those regulations – judging by what occurred in the Trump presidency from 2017-2021.

Read the full story by Stephanie Hanes: Harris and Trump think big on energy – in very different directions

Alex Gallardo/AP
At a Trump campaign rally in Coachella, California, Nessim Fournier fans his month-old daughter, Illiana, amid the desert heat.

Family issues

Family is perhaps unusually visible as a priority in the presidential campaign. Issues of safety, education, financial security, gender roles, even immigration, all funnel into a family framework. The campaigns agree on certain goals but differ in policies. 

  • Ms. Harris would raise the Child Tax Credit based on a child’s age​ – ​to $6,000 for newborns, $3,600 for children under 6, and $3,000 per child age 6 to 17.​ She suggests ​that no family should pay more than 7% of their income ​f​or child care.​ She pledges to fight attempts to pull public funding from public schools.
  • Mr. Trump calls for ​extending his 2017 tax cuts​,​ which doubled the maximum Child Tax Credit to $2,000. His platform proposes tax credits for unpaid family members who care for loved ones full time. On education, which is largely controlled at the local level, candidate Trump emphasizes parental rights and school choice – ​and eliminating the Department of Education.
Susan Walsh/AP/File
Vice President Kamala Harris watches President Joe Biden sign the treaty admitting Finland to NATO. International alliances would likely be central to her presidential foreign policy.

Foreign Policy

For many analysts, the biggest difference between the two presidential candidates when it comes to U.S. relations with the world can be boiled down to two words: multilateral and unilateral.

  • Ms. Harris is seen as a champion of America’s traditional role, leading alliances of like-minded democracies like NATO and promoting the postwar liberal world order.
  • Mr. Trump is seen as more comfortable with the idea of the U.S. defending its own interests in an era of rising big-power competition.

Read the full story by Howard LaFranchi: The Trump-Harris worldview divide: Fly solo, or with allies?

Mike Blake/Reuters
A single-family housing development is under construction in Menifee, California, Sept. 4, 2024.

Housing

America’s shortage of affordable housing increasingly affects communities nationwide. Home prices hit an all-time high this year, and about 1 in 4 renters spend more than half their income on housing and utilities.

  • Ms. Harris sets a goal of 3 million new housing units in her first four years. She proposes a $40 billion Innovation Fund for Housing Expansion, which would encourage more flexible local zoning and expanded development. She also calls for a $25,000 down payment credit for first-time homebuyers, and pledges to curb price-fixing among corporate landlords.
  • Mr. Trump promises general low inflation and deregulation, which would allow mortgage rates to fall and homes to be built more cheaply. He points to his restrictive immigration policies as a solution to easing housing demand.

Read the full story by Laurent Belsie: How Harris and Trump propose fixing the U.S. housing crisis

Brian Snyder/Reuters
Delegates hold "Mass deportation now" signs at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, July 17, 2024.

Immigration and border security

What the next president can accomplish on immigration will partly depend on factors beyond their control – other countries, courts, and Congress, which hasn’t united on major immigration reform since the 1990s.

  • Ms. Harris, a longtime immigrant advocate, has taken a right turn on this issue amid public pressure over a historic influx of unauthorized migrants under President Joe Biden. The Biden-Harris White House has touted a reduction in illegal border crossings in recent months following new asylum restrictions, along with enforcement help from Mexico. She says fixing the broken immigration system falls on Congress, and blames Mr. Trump for tanking a bipartisan bill on border security.
  • Mr. Trump has said he’d involve the military in the “largest deportation operation in American history,” calling illegal immigration an “invasion.” He also supports limiting legal immigration, including resettling refugees. In addition, Mr. Trump also says he’ll resurrect the “Remain in Mexico” policy from his time in office, which made asylum-seekers who arrived at the southern border wait in Mexico rather than the U.S. ahead of immigration court dates.

Read the full story by Sarah Matusek: On immigration, Harris and Trump talk tough – with critical differences

Andrew Harnik/AP/File
Surrounded by Army cadets, then-President Donald Trump watches the 121st Army-Navy football game, Dec. 12, 2020, in West Point, New York.

National security and the military

When it comes to how to address vital national interests, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump differ sharply. Big differences exist on two current hot spots: Ukraine and the Middle East.

  • Ms. Harris is expected to continue the White House’s military support for Ukraine’s efforts to repel Russia’s invasion and illegal occupation. On Gaza, while she condemns Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack and emphasizes that Israel has a right to defend itself, she also says she “will not be silent” about the suffering of Palestinians.
  • Mr. Trump has promised to end fighting in Ukraine in one day through negotiations. Without offering specifics, he’s implied he could do this in part by lifting U.S. sanctions against Russia. On the Middle East, he has said that Israel needs to get its war in Gaza “done quickly” and that Israel should “hit” Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Read the full story by Anna Mulrine Grobe: On military policy, Trump and Harris offer starkly different approaches

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Harris vs. Trump: Where they stand on the big issues
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2024/1031/harris-trump-policy-proposals-issues
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe