Secret Service begins swift crackdown on carousing agents

As Congress demands action, the Secret Service is moving rapidly to punish agents connected to the scandal involving prostitutes in Colombia. Three have been forced out so far.

|
Jae C. Hong/AP/File
In this 2008 photo, a Secret Service agent stands near then presidential candidate Barack Obama at a rally in Norfolk, Va. Moving swiftly, the Secret Service forced out three agents Wednesday in a prostitution scandal.

With lawmakers of both parties demanding swift action, the US Secret Service is moving rapidly to punish those responsible for the scandal involving agents and prostitutes in Colombia last week.

Three agents – two of them supervisors – are leaving the Secret Service. One resigned, one has been allowed to retire, and one has been told he will be fired for cause. Another eight agents have been placed on administrative leave and had their security clearances suspended.

"The Secret Service continues to conduct a full, thorough and fair investigation, utilizing all investigative techniques available to our agency,” Paul Morrissey, assistant director of the US Secret Service Office of Government and Public Affairs, said in a statement. “This includes polygraph examinations, interviews with the employees involved, and witness interviews, to include interviews being conducted by our Office of Professional Responsibility in Cartagena, Colombia.”

RECOMMENDED: Secret Service's Colombia scandal has election-year implications

Meanwhile, the top Republican and Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have laid out the information they want Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan to provide members of Congress.

As outlined in a letter to Mr. Sullivan from committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R) and senior Democrat Elijah Cummings, this includes “a complete description and account” of anyone involved or who knew about misconduct by agents and officers on the night of April 12-13, when agents allegedly brought prostitutes to their hotel rooms.

Lawmakers also are demanding a factual timeline of events, information regarding the age of the women involved (whether any were minors), summaries of any disciplinary actions taken against Secret Service agents and officers going back to 2007, as well as “agency failures or lapses that the US Secret Service identified that contributed to this incident.”

“The incident in Cartagena is troubling because Secret Service agents and officers made a range of bad decisions, from drinking too much, to engaging with prostitutes, to bringing foreign nationals into contact with sensitive security information, to exposing themselves to blackmail and other forms of potential compromise,” Reps. Issa and Cummings wrote.

The White House and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney continue to express confidence in Secret Service Director Sullivan, as do members of Congress.

“Today’s personnel actions, combined with the swift removal and investigation, are positive signs that there is a serious effort to get to the bottom of this scandal,” Sen. Charles Grassley, (R) of Iowa, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement late Wednesday. “I’ve always said that if heads don’t roll, the culture in a federal agency will never change,”

Investigators have identified and begun to interview at least 20 women believed to be prostitutes who were brought into the hotel, the Associated Press reported. Officials knew who they were because they were required to leave personal identification at the front desk. Local police were called after a disturbance broke out, reportedly over whether one of the prostitutes would get paid.

At this point, it appears that none of the agents involved had weapons, radios, schedules or other potentially sensitive material in their rooms, nor were they part of the elite unit responsible for guarding President Obama when he arrived that morning for the Summit of the Americas.

Ten US military members who also stayed at the hotel face a separate Pentagon investigation on charges of misconduct involving prostitutes.

Two US military officials have said they include five Army Green Berets, reports the AP. One of the officials said the group also includes two Navy Explosive Ordinance Disposal technicians, two Marine dog handlers, and an Air Force airman.

Rep. Peter King (R) of New York, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, told Politico he expects an investigation into the culture of the Secret Service, especially how agents conduct themselves on trips.

“To me, if you are a sniper, you shouldn’t be drinking at all” before protecting the president, Rep. King said.

“I will tell you that I find it very hard to believe that this was a one-time incident,” Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the top Republican on the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, told reporters. “There were too many people involved and that really troubles me and that’s something that I’ve pressed the director on.”

RECOMMENDED: Secret Service's Colombia scandal has election-year implications

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Secret Service begins swift crackdown on carousing agents
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0418/Secret-Service-begins-swift-crackdown-on-carousing-agents
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe