Knives on planes? TSA chief, defending policy, gets an earful in Congress.

The TSA chief, testifying before a House Homeland Security subcommittee, said allowing small knives on planes would keep flights safe while the agency focuses on the threat from explosives.

|
Gene Blythe/AP/File
This mountain of knives represents just a few of the hundreds of items discarded at Atlanta International Airport. Starting in April 2013, airline passengers will be allowed to carry previously banned items, announced TSA chief John Pistole on March 5.

A new federal policy to allow pocketknives in airplane cabins drew criticism in Congress Thursday, as some lawmakers joined flight attendants and others in questioning the security change.

John Pistole, the administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, defended the policy shift, saying loosened standards would keep flights safe while allowing TSA personnel to focus their screening on the real threat – explosives.

A number of lawmakers voiced skepticism, however, as Mr. Pistole testified before the transportation subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee.

“Why now?” asked Rep. Eric Swallwell (D) of California, citing the success that current screening practices have had since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

“These can cause a terrible tragedy,” said Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D) of Texas, pointing to pictures of open pocketknives. She said the policy should go “back to the drawing table.”

The new carry-on standards, announced earlier this month, will allow passengers to board planes carrying small pocketknives and some sports items such as a souvenir baseball bat or a golf club.

“This decision aligns TSA with International Civil Aviation Organization standards and our European counterparts,” the agency said in announcing the shift, which goes into effect April 25.

Pistole said the change is part of the agency’s “risk-based” approach to combating terrorism. Terrorists “remain focused” on attacking aircraft, he said. But the evidence from intelligence and from attempted attacks suggests their method of choice involves non-metallic improvised explosives.

The new policy on knives, however, has sparked outcries from many airline workers and groups connected to the industry.

The Association of Professional Flight Attendants, for one, is backing a “no knives on planes” petition.

“Had agency officials consulted with Flight Attendants, they likely would have come to a different conclusion regarding these items,” the group says on its website.

Doug Parker, chief executive of US Airways, wrote a letter on March 11 to Pistole asking him to reconsider the policy, complaining of a lack of input from the industry and saying that the change “might place our flight attendants’ safety at risk.”

At the hearing Thursday, as he responded to a question on whether industry personnel had meaningful input in the process, Pistole said, “I could have done a better job.”

He said he had notified a senior member of the flight attendants’ association of the possible change back in November. He added that federal air marshals were closely involved in the process.

Pistole also said that the TSA is focused on preventing terrorist attacks, not assessing potential risks posed by passengers who might be drunk or mentally ill.

He added that not all small knives are allowed under the new policy – and showed pictures with examples of those still banned. Pistole said that since the 9/11 attacks, no attacks have occurred on planes involving permitted items such as small scissors or knitting needles. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Knives on planes? TSA chief, defending policy, gets an earful in Congress.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2013/0314/Knives-on-planes-TSA-chief-defending-policy-gets-an-earful-in-Congress
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe