Can 'Woman in Gold' bill liberate 'final prisoners of World War II'?

A Senate hearing discussed a bill to help families of Holocaust victims reclaim artwork stolen by the Nazis. The bill is supported by Jewish advocacy groups and Helen Mirren, star of the film 'Woman in Gold.'

|
Gary Cameron/Reuters
Actress Dame Helen Mirren (r.) greets Sen. Chuck Schumer (D) of New York (l.), former US Ambassador to Austria Ronald Lauder (c.), and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D) of Connecticut (2nd r.) before giving her testimony at a joint Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing to discuss legislation to 'facilitate the return of stolen artwork by the Nazis during the Holocaust' on June 7.

A movie star, four Republicans, and two New England Democrats have teamed up to aid a cause that everyone agrees with but that has been tricky to implement so far – the return of artwork stolen by Nazis to Holocaust victims and their families.

A Senate hearing on Tuesday discussed a bill giving Holocaust victims and their families six years after finding their artwork in museums or private collections to sue for its recovery, bypassing any statutes of limitations.

No one has objected to the bill’s moral grounding. The 1998 Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the 2009 Terezin Declaration, and an international code for museums already assure a return of the stolen artwork now in the custody of museums, private collections, and governments.

But until now, these agreements have lacked the teeth for enforcement.

“Two-thirds of the [50] nations that have endorsed agreements regarding research, publicity and claims for Nazi-era looted art have done little or nothing to implement those pacts,” according to a 2014 report by the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany and the World Jewish Restitution Organization. 

This bill, sponsored by a bipartisan team of senators from Connecticut, New York, South Dakota, Texas, and Utah, hopes to create new momentum to return the artwork.

Museums, including "the leading institutions in our nation ... have been complicit in this injustice," said co-sponsor Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D) of Connecticut at the hearing. "They have indirectly aided and abetted the thuggery of the Nazis."

The issue received public attention last year with the film “Woman in Gold,” in which a woman successfully fights the courts to retrieve a painting of her aunt from the Austrian government. The film’s star, Dame Helen Mirren, spoke at the hearing to support to the cause.

"Art lost in the Holocaust is not just important for its aesthetic and cultural value," Dame Helen told lawmakers. "Restoring physical parts of lost heritage to a Holocaust victim and their families is a moral imperative."

She continued, "For me and many families fighting, art restitution has little to do with potential financial gains.... It gives Jewish people – and other victims of the Nazi terror – the opportunity to reclaim their history, their culture, their memories and, most importantly, their families.”

By resetting the statutes of limitations, this law hopes to erode the legal defenses levied by museums and private collections that have made reclamation efforts prohibitively expensive and time-consuming.

“I wish this legislation had happened 10 or 20 years ago, but the fact is that it’s happened, it’s going to have a major effect on the future,” World Jewish Congress President Ronald Lauder told the Senate panel Tuesday. “And many works of art – I use the expression ‘the final prisoners of World War II’ – will finally find their rightful owners.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can 'Woman in Gold' bill liberate 'final prisoners of World War II'?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2016/0608/Can-Woman-in-Gold-bill-liberate-final-prisoners-of-World-War-II
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe