Years after Breonna Taylor’s death, jury finds Kentucky cop guilty of excessive force

A federal jury Nov. 1 found a former Kentucky police officer guilty of using excessive force on Breonna Taylor. This is the first conviction of a police officer who was involved in the deadly raid that sparked national protests in 2020.

|
Dylan Lovan/AP
Tamika Palmer, Breonna Taylor's mother (center left), hugs a friend in Louisville, Kentucky, Nov. 1, 2024, after a former Kentucky police officer was convicted in federal court for using excessive force when he fired his gun during a raid that killed Ms. Taylor in 2020.

A federal jury on Nov. 1 convicted a former Kentucky police detective of using excessive force on Breonna Taylor during a botched 2020 drug raid that left her dead.

The 12-member jury returned the late-night verdict after clearing Brett Hankison earlier in the evening on a charge that he used excessive force on Ms. Taylor’s neighbors.

It was the first conviction of a Louisville police officer who was involved in the deadly raid.

Some members of the jury were in tears as the verdict was read around 9:30 p.m. They had earlier indicated to the judge in two separate messages that they were deadlocked on the charge of using excessive force on Taylor, but chose to continue deliberating. The six-man, six-woman jury deliberated for more than 20 hours over three days.

Ms. Taylor’s mother, Tamika Palmer, celebrated the verdict with friends outside the federal courthouse, saying: “It took a lot of time. It took a lot of patience. It was hard. The jurors took their time to really understand that Breonna deserved justice.”

In a statement posted to social media Nov. 2, the Louisville Metro Police Department said that it respects the jury’s verdict and that since 2020, it has improved training, practices and policies, and implemented reforms emphasizing “accountability and thorough investigations.”

“It is not lost on us that this event forever altered the fabric of our community, and we acknowledge the pain caused by the death of Breonna Taylor,” the department said. “Our officers are sworn to protect and serve the community, upholding the law with integrity and fairness. We condemn any behavior that runs afoul of the mission to help and protect our citizens.”

“Breonna Taylor’s life mattered,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “We hope the jury’s verdict recognizing this violation of Ms. Taylor’s civil and constitutional rights brings some small measure of comfort to her family and loved ones who have suffered so deeply from the tragic events of March 2020.”

Mr. Hankison fired 10 shots into Ms. Taylor’s glass door and windows during the raid, but didn’t hit anyone. Some shots flew into a next-door neighbor’s adjoining apartment.

The death of the 26-year-old Black woman, along with the May 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis sparked racial injustice protests nationwide.

Bernice King, the daughter of Martin Luther King Jr., called the verdict “a long-awaited moment of accountability.”

“While it cannot restore Breonna to her family, it represents a crucial step in the pursuit of justice and a reminder that no one should be above the law,” Ms. King said in a social media post the night of Nov. 1.

A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Mr. Hankison last year, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022.

The conviction against Mr. Hankison carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. He will be sentenced on March 12 by U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings.

Mr. Hankison argued throughout the trial that he was acting to protect his fellow officers after Ms. Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired on them when they broke down Ms. Taylor’s door with a battering ram.

This jury sent a note on Oct. 31 to the judge asking whether they needed to know if Ms. Taylor was alive as Mr. Hankison fired his shots.

That was a point of contention during closing arguments, when Mr. Hankison’s attorney Don Malarcik told the jury that prosecutors must “prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Taylor was alive” when Mr. Hankison fired.

After the jury sent the question, Ms. Jennings urged them to keep deliberating.

Mr. Walker shot and wounded one of the officers. Mr. Hankison testified that when Mr. Walker fired, he moved away, rounded the corner of the apartment unit and fired into Taylor’s glass door and a window.

Meanwhile, officers at the door returned Mr. Walker’s fire, hitting and killing Ms. Taylor, who was in a hallway.

Mr. Hankison’s lawyers argued during closing statements Oct. 30 that Mr. Hankison was acting properly “in a very tense, very chaotic environment” that lasted about 12 seconds. They emphasized that Mr. Hankison’s shots didn’t hit anyone.

Mr. Hankison was one of four officers charged by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2022 with violating Ms. Taylor’s civil rights. Mr. Hankison’s verdict is the second conviction from those cases. The first was a plea deal from a former officer who was not at the raid and became a cooperating witness in another case.

Mr. Malarcik, Mr. Hankison’s attorney, spoke at length during closing arguments about the role of Ms. Taylor’s boyfriend, who fired the shot that hit former Sgt. John Mattingly at the door. He said Mr. Walker never tried to come to the door or turn the lights on as police were knocking and instead armed himself and hid in the dark.

“Brett Hankison was 12 inches away from being shot by Kenneth Walker,” Mr. Malarcik said.

Prosecutors said Mr. Hankison acted recklessly, firing 10 shots into doors and a window where he couldn’t see a target.

They said in closing arguments that Mr. Hankison “violated one of the most fundamental rules of deadly force: If they cannot see the person they’re shooting at, they cannot pull the trigger.”

Neither of the officers who shot Ms. Taylor – Mr. Mattingly and former Detective Myles Cosgrove – were charged in Ms. Taylor’s death. Federal and state prosecutors have said those officers were justified in returning fire, since Ms. Taylor’s boyfriend shot at them first.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Years after Breonna Taylor’s death, jury finds Kentucky cop guilty of excessive force
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2024/1104/Breonna-Taylor-cop-convicted-2020-protests-BLM
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe