Mainstream media biased against Romney? Four points to consider.

Many supporters of Mitt Romney argue that his potential path toward the White House has been made a lot steeper by the media. Here are some of the main arguments pro and con.

2. Who's doing the reporting and editing?

Jim Urquhart/REUTERS
A reporter for the Philadelphia Inquirer sits in the media center set up at the University of Denver Monday for the first of the 2012 presidential debates in Denver.

If the "news media" are biased, then the buck stops with real people, presumably those who work at newspapers, magazines, and broadcast newsrooms.

No, news organizations aren't biased

Many journalists try to check their partisan preferences at the newsroom door and try to offer balanced stories to inform the public. Their reporting is still subjective, but this ideal puts some constraints on bias. Also, journalists of all stripes are subject to critique from "fact checkers" within the profession, as well as from "fact checkers of the fact checkers" outside the mainstream media.

"Politico’s media criticism criticized by media critics" was one headline this year at the Poynter Institute's journalism website. Another one from Poynter in September: "Washington Post fact-checker, columnist fact-check each other."

The media are more diverse than ever. The world of journalism now includes a range of bloggers, commentators, and columnists who wouldn't have had such a voice in the era before the Internet and cable TV. Biases are becoming more transparent. And they aren't always liberal. Sometimes it's conservative bias, or a bias toward conventional rather than unusual views.

Yes, they are

Consider the results of a 1997 survey of newspaper staffs across America. It found a liberal tilt, especially at large papers. "On papers of at least 50,000 circulation, 65 percent of the staffs are liberal/Democrat or leaning that way, and 12 percent are conservative/Republican or leaning that way," the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE) said in releasing its survey results.

The gap at smaller papers was less pronounced, but still "predominantly liberal" by 51 percent to 23 percent. Within editorial-page departments, the survey found, the share of conservatives or independents was higher than it was in newsrooms at large.

The conservative Media Research Center cites other studies done before and since the ASNE one – including surveys focused on the Washington press corps – that also found liberal viewpoints outnumbering conservative ones by a wide margin.

2 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.