Is Dems' endangered US Senate seat in Colorado safer now?

Top Democrats in Colorado this week managed to keep two antifracking measures off the ballot – initiatives that could have caused Sen. Mark Udall (D) all sorts of difficulty in his tight reelection bid.

|
Susan Walsh/AP/File
Sen. Mark Udall (D) of Colorado on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 31, 2013.

In the end, top Colorado Democrats decided that retaining Democratic control of the US Senate trumps planting a stake in the ground against fracking, a controversial oil- and gas-drilling method that had threatened to divide Democratic voters in the state and hurt Sen. Mark Udall's chances for reelection.

A compromise unveiled Monday will keep two antifracking initiatives off the ballot, instead establishing a panel to assess the drilling technique – and kicking the issue down the road past the 2014 midterm election. Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) of Colorado announced the deal alongside Rep. Jared Polis (D) of Boulder, who helped bankroll the ballot measures. The governor and Senator Udall had opposed them. Previous efforts to strike a deal had stalled in mid-July.

State Democrats worried the split over fracking could divide and weaken the Democratic base in November. Control of the US Senate may come down to a few competitive elections, and Udall’s tight race with US Rep. Cory Gardner (R) could turn out to be one of them.

The ballot measures’ potential impact on Udall’s race was “clearly a significant factor” in the compromise, says independent Colorado pollster Floyd Ciruli. “That the Senate is in play made it all the more important,” he said in a phone interview Tuesday.

Fracking has revitalized Colorado's energy sector, and the oil and gas industry was poised to flood the state with millions in advertising aimed at defeating the antifracking measures. Udall and Hickenlooper were concerned that, if the measures were defeated, the Senate seat and governorship could be collateral damage.

Udall lauded the compromise Monday. "This deal – which averts a divisive and counterproductive ballot fight over one-size-fits-all restrictions – is welcome news and underscores how all of Colorado benefits when we find common ground," Udall said in a statement.

The Senate race in Colorado became competitive in March, when Representative Gardner jumped in and Republicans coalesced around him.

“When this year began, we did not have the Udall seat on the list as a seat that would be potentially at risk,” Mr. Ciruli says. “Once Cory Gardner got in it, and polls indicated it was within a few percentage points, it changed the entire character of the race.”

It also changed the significance of the fracking initiatives. Democratic strategist Steve McMahon told Time magazine in June that the ballot initiatives could motivate Republicans to turn out in force for November’s midterms.

“The concern among many Democrats is that the ballot initiatives that we’re talking about are very, very appealing the farther left you go; troubling at the center; and on the right, they are turnout machines,” he told Time.

Gardner has criticized Udall’s record on oil and gas, accusing him of an “extreme anti-energy agenda.”

"Colorado has the most stringent energy regulations in the country,” Gardner said in a statement released to the Monitor Tuesday. “I don't believe we need to further regulate our energy economy, and Congressman Polis should have dropped these destructive initiatives long ago.”

One initiative Polis backed would have mandated that drilling operations be set back 2,000 feet from homes and schools. The other would have added an “environmental bill of rights” to the state constitution.

Overall, the oil and gas industry is pleased with the compromise – especially given how crucial fracking is to oil and gas development in the state.

Energy production supports 200,000 jobs in Colorado, according to the American Petroleum Institute, a Washington-based oil and gas industry trade organization. The industry says there are already sufficient environmental safeguards.

“Colorado has some of the strongest oil and gas regulations in the country,” API President and CEO Jack Gerard said in a statement Monday, adding that the industry will continue to work “with state regulators and local communities to protect the environment while promoting economic growth.”

Late Monday, backers of two pro-fracking initiatives said they, too, would pull their measures off the November ballot. One measure would have penalized localities that banned fracking by withholding oil and gas revenue from them.

The compromise also means the state will drop its challenge to Longmont, Colo.’s fracking ban, Hickenlooper said. A state judge overturned the ban in late July. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is Dems' endangered US Senate seat in Colorado safer now?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Senate/2014/0805/Is-Dems-endangered-US-Senate-seat-in-Colorado-safer-now
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe