Boston Marathon bomber: What to expect on Tsarnaev sentencing day

At the official sentencing of convicted Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, more than 30 victims and their family members are expected Wednesday to describe the attack's impact on their lives.

|
(AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)
Protesters stand outside federal court in Boston where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev will be formally sentenced, Wednesday, June 24, 2015, for his role in the Boston Marathon bombing. A federal jury last month condemned Tsarnaev to die for the 2103 bombing that killed three people and wounded more than 260.

Victims of the Boston Marathon bombing and their family members are expected to speak on Wednesday before a judge formally sentences bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to death. More than 30 people who were either injured or lost family members will describe the impact the bombing had on their lives. 

Mr. Tsarnaev, 21, was condemned to die by lethal injection by a federal jury in May for the attack he and his older brother Tamerlan carried out at the 2013 marathon. The Tsarnaev brothers detonated two pressure-cooker bombs near the Boston marathon finish line, killing three people and injuring 264.

Tsarnaev’s sentencing hearing will be held Wednesday morning in U.S. District Court. Judge George O'Toole Jr. is required to impose the jury's sentence under the federal death penalty law.

“Why does this murder deserve the death penalty while other murders do not?” prosecutor Steve Mellin said in his closing statement last month. “The defendant didn’t simply kill people. He killed them using a weapon of mass destruction. Its purpose is not to kill a specific victim, its purpose is to kill indiscriminately. And not just kill. Destroy.”

Among the victims scheduled to speak on Wednesday are Rebekah Gregory of Texas, who lost a leg in the bombing, and Liz Norden, whose two sons each lost a leg.

Tsarnaev, who was convicted of 30 federal charges for planning and carrying out the deadly attack, will also be given a chance to speak. 

But not all victims supported the death penalty verdict. As The Christian Science Monitor reported, the parents of 8-year-old Martin Richard, the youngest victim killed in the attack, made a plea in The Boston Globe that Tsarnaev not receive the death penalty. They argued that a death penalty conviction – with all its appeals – would harm their ability to heal.

"We know that the government has its reasons for seeking the death penalty, but the continued pursuit of that punishment could bring years of appeals and prolong reliving the most painful day of our lives," they wrote. 

The jurors (who were already sequestered when the article was published) sentenced Tsarnaev to death.

During Tsarnaev’s trial earlier this year, the court heard testimony from people who lost loved ones in the bombing. Speakers included the fathers of Martin Richard and Krystle Campbell, an aunt of Lingzi Lu, and the brother of Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer Sean Collier, whom the Tsarnaevs shot and killed three days after the bombing.

Tsarnaev's lawyers admitted he was a partner in the bombings, but argued that the attack was primarily planned and driven by his older brother. Tamerlan died after being shot by police and run over by his younger brother in a stolen car during a massive manhunt days after the attack.

The bombing was intended to retaliate against the U.S. for its actions in Muslim countries, according to a note Tsarnaev wrote inside the boat he was found hiding in.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Boston Marathon bomber: What to expect on Tsarnaev sentencing day
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0624/Boston-Marathon-bomber-What-to-expect-on-Tsarnaev-sentencing-day
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe