Skip to footer

Religious freedom or discrimination? ACLU, Mississippi battle over law

The American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi filed suit against the state on behalf of an engaged gay couple on Monday, as the nationwide religious liberty debate continues.

|
Bruce Newman/Oxford Eagle via AP
The Lafayette-Oxford-University Pride Parade grand marshall rolls through the Square in Oxford, Miss., on Saturday. On Monday the Mississippi ACLU filed suit against the state for a law it says legalizes discrimination against the LGBT community.

Mississippi’s American Civil Liberties Union filed suit against the state on behalf of a gay couple on Monday, saying that a law that enables workers to deny services to people based on their religious objections to same-sex marriage is discriminatory. 

Mississippi is just the latest legal battleground where religious conservatives are trying to foment religious freedoms that they say have been eroded by the US Supreme Court decision to legalize same-sex marriage last year. Such debates have become commonplace as Americans struggle to balance notions of religious freedom and civil rights.

Mississippi's law, known as House Bill 1523, was filed by the Republican-majority legislature last summer after the Supreme Court decision. It was signed by Republican Gov. Phil Bryant earlier this month and is set to become law on July 1. Governor Bryant has described the law as a necessary means to protect Mississippians' "sincerely held religious liberties and moral convictions."

In the eyes of civil rights activists, it opens the door for legal discrimination.

"We've had a long history in Mississippi of bigotry and discrimination, and House Bill 1523 brings that back to life," Oliver Diaz, a former state Supreme Court justice who filed the lawsuit Monday in US District Court in Jackson, told reporters. 

Supporters say the law supports the idea that marriage should only be between a man and a woman, while opponents say it denies basic constitutional rights.

Since the Supreme Court decision, states have passed more than 200 laws that LGBT advocates consider discriminatory, according to Time.

Furthermore, conservative states have overturned anti-LGBT discrimination ordinances by individual cities – Charlotte, N.C., for example. Other conservative-run states such as Tennessee, Arkansas, and Indiana also have blocked local attempts to pass such rules on behalf of LGBT residents.  

North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory filed a lawsuit Monday morning, asking the federal courts to clarify federal law. The filing effectively buys him more time and challenges the Justice Department's move to rescind the so-called state "bathroom law."

The Mississippi law suit centers around the rights of Nykolas Alford and Stephen Thomas, a couple from the eastern Mississippi city of Meridian. The two men have been engaged since 2014 and intend to marry but are concerned that they will be denied services if they do.

"Our grandparents experienced discrimination for being black, and my parents probably did as well," Mr. Alford said. "My parents were born in the '60s and grew up in the '70s and '80s, and so it's always been a part of our lives. We thought this movement was over, you know? We thought that we would be fine. We thought that we would be equal, and here we are today saying that we're not, and we want equality."

Spokesmen for the governor's office and the attorney general's office did not immediately respond to Associated Press's requests for comment about the lawsuit.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Religious freedom or discrimination? ACLU, Mississippi battle over law
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0509/Religious-freedom-or-discrimination-ACLU-Mississippi-battle-over-law
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe