Judge in one-month-for-rape case agrees to be censured

The Montana judge who said a 14-year-old rape victim appeared 'older than her chronological age' and sentenced her rapist to 31 days in prison has waived formal disciplinary proceedings and asked the state Supreme Court to decide his punishment.

|
Larry Mayer/Billings Gazette/AP/File
Montana District Judge G. Todd Baugh presides at a hearing in Great Falls, Mont. A judicial oversight board says Baugh should be disciplined for saying a 14-year-old rape victim was 'older than her chronological age' when he sentenced her rapist to just one month in prison.

A Montana judge who said a 14-year-old rape victim appeared older than her chronological age waived formal disciplinary proceedings Tuesday and asked the state Supreme Court to decide his punishment.

District Judge G. Todd Baugh said in response to a complaint from a judicial oversight panel that his comments and actions in the case appeared improper and had failed to promote public confidence in the courts.

The Judicial Standards Commission has been investigating Baugh's actions since last summer when his comments about a rape victim who had committed suicide sparked public outrage and drew calls for him to be removed from the bench.

In a complaint filed against the 72-year-old Billings judge this month, the commission faulted the one-month prison sentence that Baugh gave to convicted rapist Stacey Rambold as overly lenient.

An attorney for the five-member commission said Baugh had justified his actions by blaming the child victim.

Rambold, a former teacher at Billings Senior High School, has since been freed. An appeal of his sentence is pending after prosecutors said Rambold should have served a mandatory minimum of four years in jail.

In his Tuesday response to the commission's complaint, Baugh wrote that the allegations against him were "mostly true."

He added that he would "submit myself to the Montana Supreme Court for public reprimand and/or censure."

But Baugh took issue with the claim that his sentence was too lenient.

He pointed out that Rambold was convicted under a 2010 deferred prosecution agreement that originally allowed the defendant to go free after the victim's death. Rambold's trial was pending at the time but prosecutors decided not to proceed after losing their main witness.

The case was revived when Rambold violated the terms of his sex offender treatment program by failing to report a sexual relationship with an adult woman and having unsupervised visits with the children of relatives. He was sentenced last August to 15 years in prison with all but one month suspended.

"The defendant was still a low risk to reoffend, had not reoffended and was still treatable in the community," Baugh wrote in Tuesday's response. "In any sentence, it is possible that some see it as lenient while others may see it as harsh."

Rambold's attorney, Jay Lansing, has previously declined to speak publicly about the case and did not immediately respond to a telephone message requesting comment.

Baugh was first elected in 1984. He's announced he won't seek re-election when his current six-year term ends this year.

Marian Bradley with the Montana chapter of the National Organization for Women said Tuesday she hopes the Supreme Court will hold a public hearing on the case to put Baugh under the spotlight.

"We want to make sure he gets sanctioned in some fashion," Bradley said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Judge in one-month-for-rape case agrees to be censured
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0218/Judge-in-one-month-for-rape-case-agrees-to-be-censured
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe