Christie spokesman says governor knew nothing of bridge plot

Speaking before a New Jersey legislative committee, Gov. Chris Christie's longtime press secretary, Michael Drewniak, said he had complete confidence Christie had no involvement with the lane closures on the George Washington Bridge.

Gov. Chris Christie's longtime press secretary told New Jersey lawmakers Tuesday that he is confident that his boss and other senior advisers had no advance knowledge of the scheme that shut traffic near the George Washington Bridge in a political payback plot.

Michael Drewniak, who has been Christie's chief spokesman since he became US attorney for New Jersey in 2001, called last September's lane closings reckless and perplexing in an opening statement before a New Jersey legislative committee investigating the plot. He said he was misled into believing the lanes were blocked to study traffic patterns, an explanation that has since been discredited. He said he still has no idea why a government resource was used for political retribution.

"I can say with complete confidence and comfort that none of these people — starting with Gov. Chris Christie — had any involvement whatsoever in this reckless and perplexing episode," he said.

Drewniak, who is part of Christie's inner circle of aides and advisers, is the most senior administration official to be questioned under oath about the lane closings.

The scheme carried out last fall by loyalists to Christie, a Republican, has become a major distraction as the governor contemplates a 2016 presidential run. Christie has denied knowing about the plot.

It is the subject of at least two ongoing investigations. One is by the US attorney's office for New Jersey, and its scope is not entirely clear. Drewniak has testified before a federal grand jury as part of that probe, his lawyer has said. Federal authorities are also looking at whether Christie's administration distributed federal aid for superstorm Sandy recovery in a way that would reward political allies or punish foes.

The joint legislative investigation is being overseen by Democrats and has been dismissed by some Republicans as a politically motivated witch hunt. The lawmakers' inquest has been slowed because two key figures have refused to turn over documents and a third has refused to testify. All have cited their right not to incriminate themselves.

The lawmakers have released reams of documents, including the most damning statement so far, former Christie aide Bridget Kelly's e-mail to David Wildstein, then an official at the transit agency that runs the bridge, saying "time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee" a few weeks before the lane closures that backed up traffic into that town.

Drewniak was interviewed by lawyers hired by Christie to review the closings. Their report, issued in March and called a whitewash by many Democrats, concluded that neither Christie nor anyone in his inner circle did anything wrong.

Drewniak, who was accompanied by a lawyer, testified that the traffic jams initially seemed to be of minor importance, but escalated through the fall as reporters' inquiries intensified and new details emerged.

Drewniak had a professional and social relationship with Wildstein, and the two had dinner on Dec. 4, shortly before Wildstein was forced to resign his $150,000-a-year job as questions grew about what happened at the foot of the bridge in the fall.

Drewniak said he had only one discussion with the governor about the lane closings, after the dinner with Wildstein. Drewniak testified that he informed Christie of Wildstein's claim that he told the governor of the lane closings during a 9/11 remembrance event. Christie has said he doesn't recall any conversation with Wildstein and says a discussion about traffic jams would not have registered as unusual. Drewniak said Wildstein maintained that the lane closings were part of a traffic study, a claim that has since been discredited.

Drewniak himself was grilled for two hours by the Christie administration in January, after which the governor decided not to fire him.

The legislative panel heard last week from former aide Christina Renna, who worked for Kelly while the lanes were blocked. Ms. Renna described her former boss as erratic and overwhelmed but said she would not have decided to cause traffic jams without orders to do so.

Two port authority executives are to appear before the panel next month; a Christie campaign aide is set to testify next week.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Christie spokesman says governor knew nothing of bridge plot
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0513/Christie-spokesman-says-governor-knew-nothing-of-bridge-plot
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe