Ukraine crisis: What can US sanctions against Russian elites achieve?

Under the right conditions, sanctions against individual Russians can be effective over time, experts say. The question, as the US moved Thursday to impose such sanctions amid Russia's Ukraine gambit, is whether such conditions exist.

|
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Roman Pzystach, from western Ukraine, waves the American flag as he joins his compatriots and their supporters during a rally in front of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 6, 2014, to protest Russian President Vladimir Putin's 'invasion of Ukraine and aggression in the region.'

New sanctions by the US government against individual Russians are designed to prod Vladimir Putin to the bargaining table – and to send a signal that if the Ukraine crisis persists, tougher economic penalties against Russia will follow.

The US move represents a modest and early step on the path of applying economic pressure on Russia's president, aimed at persuading him to respect Ukraine's territorial integrity and reverse his military intervention in its Crimea region. With that, the top-of-mind question is: Do such sanctions against individuals work?

Yes, international finance experts say, but only under the right conditions.

Here's what President Obama said Thursday the United States is doing: Denying travel visas to certain (unnamed) Russian individuals, and using a newly signed executive order to open the door to financial penalties on Russians as well.

Sanctions can provide powerful leverage, international finance experts say, if they gain wide international backing and are not imposed unilaterally by the US.

If the sanctions are tough and Western nations are united, the penalties “could be actually quite effective over time,” Robert Kahn, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, said in a conference call with reporters earlier this week.

So far, however, it’s not clear if the US and European nations – key players in the West’s response to Russia’s Ukraine gambit – are agreed on strong and coordinated action. European nations have taken some actions in recent days, but diverse views exist within the group.

On Thursday, US Secretary of State John Kerry sought to downplay the differences. “I do not believe there is a gap” among European nations, he said at a press conference in Rome. There “may be some differences of opinion about timing or about one particular choice versus another.”

The US and Europe are achieving unity to some degree. The US has suspended trade and investment talks with Russia. The European Union on Thursday did the same, and it is holding up a pre-conflict proposal to grant visa-free travel to Russian citizens.

EU President Herman Van Rompuy said economic sanctions could follow, including travel bans and asset freezes on specific individuals – similar to the steps the White House announced.

Key questions, though, are when would either the US or the EU start to impose financial penalties such as freezing property held by Russian individuals in the West, and which Russians would be singled out in such a move?

“I don't have a timetable for you” about designating Russian individuals for financial penalties, White House spokesman Jay Carney said during a briefing Thursday. He also declined to say whether the US would include Mr. Putin himself in any financial sanctions.

US visa restrictions are already in effect for some Russians and some Ukrainians whom the US believes to have supported the incursion by Russia’s military into the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, in southern Ukraine.

“The State Department has … put in place restrictions on the travel of certain individuals and officials,” Mr. Obama said.

The Obama administration has framed the pre-sanctions steps it is taking with carefully calibrated rhetoric. Secretary Kerry, in effect, said the US is starting with small moves because it is focused on trying to bring the key parties into negotiations, not to drive anyone away.

“There is a reason why only the legal framework [to freeze bank accounts and other assets] was put in place and not the specific designations” of individuals, Kerry said. “We want to be able to have the dialogue that leads to the de-escalation.”

But another senior administration official, speaking to reporters by phone, said Russian power brokers are now “on notice” that they may lose access to financial assets in the US.

Because the US is so important to the world economy, its move to impose financial restrictions on Russian power brokers delivers at least some sting. But such action is much more powerful when the international community takes such action in concert.

“Creating pain for the Russian elites and creating incentive for a deal,” such as through asset freezes, “will require multilateral support,” said Mr. Kahn.

Russia's business oligarchs have business interests, money, and homes in the West, he said.

If Putin doesn’t back down on his apparent efforts to pry Crimea away from Ukraine, international sanctions against Russians could grow in scale quickly. Potentially, Western sanctions could also involve efforts to cut off Russia’s energy exports (a move that would also impose costs on the West in the form of higher natural gas prices) or to isolate Russia’s banking sector. But some foreign affairs experts doubt whether the US and Europe have the stomach to impose severe economic sanctions. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Ukraine crisis: What can US sanctions against Russian elites achieve?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2014/0306/Ukraine-crisis-What-can-US-sanctions-against-Russian-elites-achieve
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe