Skip to footer

Walker's super PAC rivals Cruz's, as total funds raised approaches $400M

Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, and now Scott Walker lead the candidates in money raised by super PACS. In the polls, Governor Walker competes with Mr. Bush and tails Donald Trump.

|
Mike Burley/Telegraph Herald via AP
Republican presidential candidate Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker addresses a crowd at Giese Manufacturing, Sunday, in Dubuque, Iowa. His super PAC reported $20 million in funds raised for the candidate.

Candidates on both sides of the 2016 presidential election have raised a total of almost $400 million so far this year, USA Today reported.

The super PACs backing former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) have amassed the most money so far in the race, but Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker soared up to third place just over a week after entering the race. The sheer volume of money being funneled into these super PACs, experts say, hints at the expanded role mega-donors will play in the upcoming election.

Mr. Bush’s super PAC called Right to Rise brought in $103 million during the first half of the year, nearly a quarter of the total funds across all candidates, USA Today reported. Senator Cruz’s Keep the Promise union of four super PACS has logged just under a third as much, at $38 million, according to CNN.  Governor Walker is hot on Cruz’s heels: his Unintimidated PAC reported in a statement Tuesday it had raised $20 million from nearly 300 donors in its first quarter, before Walker announced his candidacy.

Though Walker lacks the name recognition of some of his opponents, he has a favorable reputation among conservatives informed by his slashes to collective bargaining rights for public workers’ unions during his first term as governor.

Reuters polling has Walker winning 7.1 percent of the Republican voters’ support, making him half as popular as Bush and a third as popular as Donald Trump. But a Washington Post/ABC News poll released Monday places Scott inches ahead of Bush with 13 percent and 12 percent support respectively, and second only to Trump who got double the support, about a quarter of the overall.

"Governor Walker's record of fighting for and winning conservative reforms is translating into tremendous grassroots and financial support from across the country," Unintimidated PAC director Keith Gilkes, said in a statement.

As The Christian Science Monitor’s Mark Trumbull previously reported,

"In many ways, this growing reliance on super PACs is the logical outcome of the current legal climate for campaigns. The fact that outside money faces no caps gives candidates, donors, and political activists an incentive to emphasize that kind of fundraising and spending.”

Mr. Trumbull wrote in another story that the rise of super PACs not only changed the price of the race, but the nature of the game as well, indicating “an increasingly direct role taken by mega-donors in the American political process. They aren’t just cutting big checks. Some of them want to take an active role in how their millions are spent.”

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Walker's super PAC rivals Cruz's, as total funds raised approaches $400M
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0721/Walker-s-super-PAC-rivals-Cruz-s-as-total-funds-raised-approaches-400M
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe