Clinton dodges Keystone XL question: Where do other candidates stand?

Most of the candidates are divided along their party lines in their opinions on the Keystone XL pipeline, but Hillary Clinton has repeatedly declined to take a side.

|
Brian Snyder/Reuters
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton answers a question from the audience during a town hall campaign stop in Nashua, N.H., on Tuesday.

Hillary Clinton evaded requests for her opinion on the Keystone XL pipeline at campaign events Monday and Tuesday, while her opponents have taken strong stances and voters are urging her to do the same.

After years of debate, the fate of the channel that would carry oil from the tar sands of Canada to the Gulf of Mexico lies in President Obama’s hands. While the other presidential candidates are mostly split along party lines in their opinions on the pipeline, Mrs. Clinton has refrained from commenting because of her involvement in the project’s evaluation as secretary of State.

“No other presidential candidate was secretary of state when this process started, and I put together a very thorough, deliberative, evidence-based process to evaluate the environmental impact and other considerations of Keystone,” Clinton told reporters Monday in Des Moines, Iowa.

Clinton said she would not “second guess” Mr. Obama’s decision, and refused to say whether or not she would approve the pipeline if she were president.

“If it's undecided when I become president, I will answer your question,” she said Tuesday in New Hampshire.

Her Democratic competitor Martin O’Malley, who has made combating climate change a major point in his campaign, is vocally opposed to the pipeline. In an email to supporters sent Monday, just after Clinton’s refusal to reveal her position in Iowa, he reiterated his opposition.

"Our climate, our home, is in trouble if we do not act," Mr. O'Malley wrote in the email. "I know where I stand on Keystone XL and I have a plan to end our reliance on fossil fuels by 2050."

O’Malley’s deputy campaign manager Elisabeth Smith also made what appeared to be a sidelong reference at Clinton in a recent statement.

"Every Democrat should follow [O’Malley’s] lead and take a stand to commit to ending our reliance on fossil fuels,” she said.

Fellow Democrat Bernie Sanders has also rejected the project, while Republican candidates have generally endorsed it.

Jeb Bush wrote in a Facebook post in February, “The Keystone pipeline is a no brainer. Moves us toward energy independence & creates jobs. President Obama must stop playing politics & sign the bill.”

Scott Walker and Marco Rubio have also explicitly expressed support for the pipeline in statements over the last couple of years.

“By not acting on Keystone, the President is depriving America of a means to create jobs, take a step towards energy independence, and bolster our national security by tapping into our energy resources and those of our friends in Canada instead of tyrannical governments,” Mr. Rubio said in a 2012 statement.

Donald Trump’s approval of the project can be seen in the breakdown of his finances, as well as through verbal endorsement. His financial disclosure revealed he has invested a quarter of a million dollars in the Canadian company that would build the pipeline.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Clinton dodges Keystone XL question: Where do other candidates stand?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0728/Clinton-dodges-Keystone-XL-question-Where-do-other-candidates-stand
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe