Dallas shooting prompts national change in police tactics

Thirteen of the country's 30 biggest departments are now pairing up officers, as cities around the country search for new tactics to prevent violence against police.

|
Scott Clause/The Daily Advertiser via AP
Police officers watch protesters gathering against another group of protesters in Baton Rouge, La., Sunday. Police officers responded to reports that protesters were en route to block Interstate 10 and prevent another group of protesters from marching.

The mass shooting at a Black Lives Matter rally in Dallas last week has prompted nearly half of America's 30 biggest police departments to order their officers to pair up, according to a survey conducted by Reuters.

The attack, which left five officers dead, making it the deadliest assault on US law enforcement since 9/11, marked a new kind of danger for police and caused many departments to begin rethinking their safety strategies. 

The most common and immediate change is the doubling up of officers, a practice thirteen of the 30 largest departments have now adopted.

In Washington, D.C., the order to pair up was issued just hours after the shooting. 

"Looking at the type of attack that happened in Dallas, a two-man car, a four-man car, a 10-man car, isn't going to make much of a difference," Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier told The Washington Post. "But it makes the officers feel much safer."

For smaller departments, however, pairing up officers may not be a realistic solution in the long run. It's a "resource-intense approach and it will be a significant challenge for some police departments to sustain that strategy for very long," Thomas Manger, president of the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA), which represents police chiefs from cities across the country, told Reuters. 

Many large cities are considering additional measures beyond just pairing up officers, while trying to find a balance between increasing officer safety and maintaining a positive relationship with the communities they serve.

In a letter published in the Denver Post, Denver's police union requested that its officers wear riot gear for local protests and be armed with AR-15 assault rifles while patrolling Denver International Airport. But the idea was rejected by local police officials, who said they didn't want to send the wrong image. 

"You want to do your best to not do anything that will ramp up emotional responses," Nick Metz, the police chief of Aurora, Colo., told the Denver Post. "We don’t want to be the spark to the flames."

An Indianapolis police spokesperson said the department is now considering the future use of robots to deliver lethal force, a controversial tactic used for the first time Thursday when Dallas police used a robot to deliver and detonate explosives, killing the gunman. 

Over the longer term, police across the country will likely increase surveillance and expand their security presence at major events, Mr. Manger predicted. 

"This will cause complaints about violating people's constitutional rights to free assembly, but it is the only way to guarantee safety," he said. 

Amping up security may prove challenging for many departments, as 90 percent of America's 18,000 police forces have fewer than 50 officers, according to Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, a law enforcement policy group. In these municipalities, Mr. Wexler says, the best way to reduce mass shooting deaths is for law enforcement to gain the trust of local communities so that people will come forward and help prevent such attacks. 

This report contains material from Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Dallas shooting prompts national change in police tactics
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0711/Dallas-shooting-prompts-national-change-in-police-tactics
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe