Skip to footer

How can Venezuela resolve its political crisis? Six views.

Venezuela has been rocked by more than four months of anti-government protests and violent police crackdown. Dozens of Venezuelans have died and thousands have been arrested. But resolving the crisis still seems out of reach. Here are six perspectives on Venezuela's search for a peaceful path forward.

The journalist

Andrew Rosati
Journalist Vladimir Villegas in his studio in Caracas, Venezuela.

  • By Andrew Rosati Correspondent

Name: Vladimir Villegas
Job: Journalist and former Chavista politician
Way forward: Stay focused on peace talks

Vladimir Villegas walks a fine political line in Venezuela: He served in a number of government roles during the Chávez administration, including vice foreign minister, and he's a childhood friend of President Nicolás Maduro. However he left politics in 2007 when late President Hugo Chávez moved to amend the constitution to abolish term limits, and has been critical of the government ever since.

Mr. Villegas was involved with the recent failed peace talks, and insists it's too early to write them off as a way to resolve the political crisis. "We can't overlook that this is the first time in 12 years that both sides have come together to negotiate," he says. "It's something very positive."

The task at hand now, he says, is reestablishing conditions so that both parties come back to the table. This includes recognizing that both sides made mistakes in using or encouraging violence, and by publicly demonizing the "other."

"The government needs to address the issues of students and other citizens who have been detained for protesting," Villegas says. "And the opposition needs to denounce and distance itself from its own violent participants."

Since February, 42 people have died in protests here, over 3,000 people have been detained, and more than 170 individuals remain behind bars.

5 of 6
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.