How can Venezuela resolve its political crisis? Six views.

Venezuela has been rocked by more than four months of anti-government protests and violent police crackdown. Dozens of Venezuelans have died and thousands have been arrested. But resolving the crisis still seems out of reach. Here are six perspectives on Venezuela's search for a peaceful path forward.

The student

Andrew Rosati
Student Eduardo Gonzalez in Caracas, Venezuela.

Name: Eduardo Gonzalez
Job: Student
Way forward: Involve youth in the political reconciliation process - we "deserve a say" in Venezuela's future

Eduardo Gonzalez says Venezuelan streets will only calm down when "the government sincerely engages with students and the half of the country that voted against" the current administration of President Nicolás Maduro. The young man with long black hair shrugs off the potential of ongoing peace talks to solve the political crisis, calling them "a show for the media."

There are ample reasons to protest, says Mr. Gonzalez, pointing to spiraling inflation and crime. "You [as a student] see your future quickly sinking with your country and the government is doing nothing to change that," he says.

Over the past year, Gonzalez has been jailed twice. First during the nationwide protests that followed President Maduro's hotly contested election victory, and then again last month when he was among the hundreds of youth activists rounded up in Caracas when security forces raided protest camps across the city.

"We [were] awoken in the middle of the night by over 300 national guardsmen firing tear gas," he says. Security forces "grabbed those fleeing, hitting us."

Rather than flexing its muscles, the government now needs to engage with student leaders and activists who have thus far been forced to stay on the sidelines, Gonzalez says. He suggests organizing a conference that includes youth leaders, but warns location is key: Trying to work through these challenges at the Miraflores presidential palace means Maduro automatically has the upper hand, he says.

4 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.