China's Vice President Xi is in town: what 6 international newspapers say

3. It could thwart a potential military face-off

Financial Times, "China and US create less pacific ocean" (Analysis)

“With the troops already out of Iraq and the war in Afghanistan winding down, the administration of President Barack Obama has called for a significant transfer in resources and strategy towards the Asia-Pacific region – even at a time when the country’s finances are under huge pressure. ‘We will be strengthening our presence in the Asia-Pacific,’ Mr Obama declared last month, ‘and budget reductions will not come at the expense of that critical region.’

The reason is China. As Mr Xi will be asked to discuss when he visits the Pentagon [today], China has invested heavily in recent years in weapons that may be able to challenge American primacy in the Pacific, including radar-evading stealth fighters and anti-ship ballistic missiles. Those investments have now very much captured the attention of American policymakers.

The militaries of both countries are barely on speaking terms. And at the very top, leaders need to have franker conversations about their countries’ long-term interests and intentions.

Hu Jintao, China’s strait-laced current leader, is said by US officials to give little away even in private. That is why all eyes will be on the avuncular Mr Xi in Washington this week."

3 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.