Does hard work alone lead to prosperity? Increasingly, Chinese citizens say no.

|
Ng Han Guan/AP
A child poses near a dancing robot at an expo promoting local technologies in Beijing, July 16, 2024. Facing a groggy economy, China's ruling Communist Party is holding closed-door meetings to chart technology- and security-focused development.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 4 Min. )

Many Chinese are losing confidence in their ability to get ahead through hard work and individual merit, national survey data shows.

The data, published this month, offers a stark contrast from earlier surveys, which found that people attributed wealth or poverty to a person’s inherent abilities, effort, and education. Now, they blame inequality on an unfair economic system, says China expert Scott Rozelle, who helped lead the survey research.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

As China’s top leaders deliberate over the country’s economic future – including how to tackle inequality – new research shows regular people’s attitudes toward the economy are shifting, with fewer trusting that hard work will lead to prosperity.

Higher-income people agree that the system is tilted in their favor, with many saying their connections, rather than talent, are a central factor in their success. 

“There’s a huge rise of pessimism,” says Dr. Rozelle. “The number of people who think they’re going to be better off five years from now has fallen significantly.”

The data comes as China’s Communist Party leaders convene a highly anticipated party plenum this week to chart the country’s long-term economic policy. The negative turn in public sentiment underscores a key variable dampening China’s growth: the lack of consumer confidence.

As China’s economy continues to slow – hurt in part by weak consumer spending and a prolonged property market downturn – pressure is mounting on leaders to adopt reforms to increase social welfare spending and spur consumption. 

Li Guilan rises at dawn to travel three hours from her small, one-story farmhouse in Hebei province to sell fruit in Beijing, often not heading home until 8 p.m. For her trouble, she earns only about $14 a day, or $420 a month.

“My economic situation is no good. … I’m exhausted,” Ms. Li says, as she hustles to sell apples, cherries, and other fruit piled high in a wooden cart. “Buy another,” she urges. “It’s sweet. I picked it myself.”

As China’s Communist Party (CCP) leaders convene a highly anticipated party plenum this week to chart the country’s long-term economic policy, new national survey data shows that many Chinese, like Ms. Li, are far less optimistic than in past decades about their prospects for getting ahead.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

As China’s top leaders deliberate over the country’s economic future – including how to tackle inequality – new research shows regular people’s attitudes toward the economy are shifting, with fewer trusting that hard work will lead to prosperity.

The survey data, collected last year and published this month, reveals a growing perception that China’s economic system is unfair, and that opportunities are unequal – regardless of hard work. People’s confidence in their ability to advance economically through their own merits has also fallen.

This is a stark contrast from earlier surveys, carried out from 2004 to 2014, that found most Chinese feeling positive about economic opportunities and the rewards of hard work, says Scott Rozelle, co-director of the Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions (SCCEI) at Stanford University, who helped lead the survey research.

Ann Scott Tyson/The Christian Science Monitor
Li Guilan operates her makeshift fruit stall in Beijing, China, April 18, 2024, where she makes about $14 a day. She says her family's economic situation has worsened this year.

“There’s a huge rise of pessimism,” he says.

The negative turn in public sentiment on the economy is significant because it underscores a key variable dampening China’s growth: the lack of consumer confidence. As China’s economy continues to slow – hurt in part by weak consumer spending and a prolonged property market downturn – pressure is mounting on the party to alleviate the pain.

A chance to course-correct

Leading up to this week’s Third Plenum of the 20th Central Committee of the CCP, Chinese economists have urged Beijing to adopt fiscal and tax reforms to increase social welfare spending and spur consumption. 

“The entire government’s … orientation needs to be changed … from investment and project-oriented policies to policies that provide basic social welfare and help people increase disposable income to boost consumption,” said Li Daokui, finance professor at the School of Economics and Management at Tsinghua University in Beijing. 

Dr. Li, speaking at a Tsinghua forum in early July, called on the central government to ease the debt burdens of financially-strapped Chinese provinces, and incentivize them to expand services.

Yet it’s uncertain how far the Party leadership will go in reforming the economy to bolster growth and reduce China’s high economic inequality, which is similar to that of the United States. 

Chinese leader Xi Jinping has acknowledged China’s persistent inequality, promoting a slogan of “common prosperity” that could translate into improvements in the social safety net, experts say. 

But Mr. Xi’s clear priority remains an investment-heavy industrial policy aimed at making China a global leader in critical advanced technologies. Many Chinese lack the education and skills to compete for jobs in such industries. Indeed, millions of rural workers, jobless during the pandemic, have gravitated to the less secure, informal economy as delivery drivers, nannies, and food stall workers. 

Ann Scott Tyson/The Christian Science Monitor
Ma Yifei charges the battery of his electric scooter on a noisy Beijing street, April 18, 2024. Mr. Ma, a migrant from the city of Shijiazhuang, three hours southwest of China's capital, has lacked steady employment for years.

“I lost my job some time ago,” says Ma Yifei, a burly, middle-aged delivery driver, taking a break while he charges the battery of his electric scooter on a noisy Beijing street. 

Since his hot pot restaurant in the city of Shijiazhuang went bankrupt during the pandemic, Mr. Ma has been bouncing from one gig to another. He sleeps in a dorm and earns about 300 yuan ($41) a day, making deliveries from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. 

“The income gap is getting greater,” he says. “It’s inevitable, you can’t change it. … But the question is: how big? There should be a standard. People at the bottom still have to make a living.”

Shifting attitudes on poverty

Sluggish growth has brought into sharper focus the inequities of China’s economic system, the new survey data suggests. Unequal opportunity was cited by respondents as the top reason people are poor. In the past, people attributed wealth or poverty to a person’s inherent abilities, effort, and education – now, they blame it on an unfair economic system, Dr. Rozelle says.

Higher-income people agree that the system is tilted in their favor, the survey shows, with many saying that their connections, rather than their talent, are a central factor in their success. People’s hopes for prosperity have also waned.

Vincent Thian/AP
A man passes the Central Business District in Beijing, July 15, 2024. Several chronic problems are dragging on China's economic growth, including a weak job market, massive local government debts, and a prolonged slump in the property market.

“The number of people who think they’re going to be better off five years from now has fallen significantly,” says Dr. Rozelle.

Dr. Rozelle and Martin Whyte, professor emeritus of sociology at Harvard University, analyzed and guided the survey together with colleagues in China. Their findings were published by Big Data China, a collaboration between Stanford’s SCCEI and the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

For Ms. Li, a mother of three whose husband farms their small plot of land in Hebei province, inequality is built into China’s economic system. Rural pensions are tiny, and on the farm, “everything we produce is really cheap,” she says. Corn, for instance, sells for about 14 cents a pound. 

So Ms. Li, now in her 60s, feels she must keep working to make ends meet. In recent years, she was employed as a maid and later as a cook at a construction site, where she made steamed buns for 50 workers each day. But “this year, there’s no work,” she says.

All around her, relatively wealthy Beijingers fill the sidewalks, sometimes stopping to buy fruit. “When city people retire they get a pension – we only get a little over 1,000 yuan ($137) a year,” she says. “We get nothing.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Does hard work alone lead to prosperity? Increasingly, Chinese citizens say no.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2024/0717/China-economy-plenum-inequality-survey
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe