Is Austria's cap on number of asylum seekers breaking international law?

A 1951 UN convention operates under the principle of non-refoulement which stipulates that refugees seeking protection must not be prevented from entering a country.

|
Ronald Zak/AP
Migrants walk between registration tents at the border to Slovenia in Spielfeld, Austria. Austria’s interior minister Johanna Mikl-Leitner said the country plans to extend border controls to Italy as it plans for possible shifts in migrant inflows to the country.

Austria is standing by its decision to cap the number of asylum seekers it will take in, infuriating European Union leaders who warned that the decision would break European and international law.

The country has been an important gateway into Germany for hundreds of thousands of people, many of them Syrian refugees, who have reached its territory since last September.

But now things are changing in Vienna, as officials announced they would allow no more than 3,200 asylum seekers into its territory per day – either to travel on to neighboring countries or apply for asylum – and introduced a daily limit of 80 asylum claims.

Vienna officials say that the daily limit is needed because an EU plan that would see Turkey restrict the number of migrants leaving for Europe is not yet working, but European officials say that "Austria has a legal obligation to accept any asylum application that is made on its territory or at its border."

"As far as Austria is concerned I have to say I don't like this decision, we are questioning whether it is within European law, and we will have a friendly discussion," European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker told a news conference, according to Deutsche Welle‎.

The cap on asylum applications “would be plainly incompatible with Austria’s obligations under European and international law, including and in particular, the European convention on human rights, the Geneva convention and Article 18 of the charter of fundamental rights of the European Union,” European migration commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos said in a letter to Austrian Interior Minister Johanna Mikl-Leitner, according to the Guardian.

Under Article 18 of the charter of fundamental rights of the EU, "the right to asylum shall be guaranteed with due respect for the rules of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951."

The 1951 convention operates under the principle of "non-refoulement." The principle prohibits countries from sending refugees back to their countries of origin, particularly if the countries aren't considered safe. In other words, a refugee seeking protection must not be prevented from entering a country. This applies to all countries, including those that don't accede to the 1951 Convention or 1967 Protocol.  

The vast majority of asylum seekers have entered the EU through Italy and Greece, where they are required to be registered, but EU officials have blamed Greece for poor border controls, which allow asylum seekers to continue their journeys to northern Europe. More than 1 million people entered the EU in 2015 fleeing conflict or poverty, and some 84,000 have entered so far this year. Overwhelmed by the numbers and frustrated by their inability to agree on an effective European response, some EU countries have begun tightening border controls or putting up fences without warning their neighbors.

EU states, including Germany, Austria, and Hungary, have already introduced temporary border controls that are set to end in May but could be extended up to two years, and have urged Greece to take similar measures, threatening to isolate it from the Schengen area.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is Austria's cap on number of asylum seekers breaking international law?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2016/0219/Is-Austria-s-cap-on-number-of-asylum-seekers-breaking-international-law
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe