In Georgia, women turn out to vote in force on Election Day. Why that matters.

In Georgia, most voters cast their ballots early, and women accounted for 55% of those votes. Does that favor Kamala Harris? 

|
Eloisa Lopez/Reuters
People vote during the 2024 U.S. presidential election on Election Day, at a community center in College Park, Georgia, Nov. 5.

In a campaign marked by high interest – and anxiety – millions of Americans cast their ballots before Election Day. And a majority of those early voters, at least in states that track by gender, were women.

In the states that report gender data for votes cast, 54% of early votes have been by women versus 44% by men. That may be good news for the Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, who fares far better in polls among women than among men.

In Georgia, one of seven key battlegrounds in this election, women accounted for 55% of the massive early vote, to 45% for men, according to the Georgia secretary of state’s office. Some political experts see that edge as an indicator of strength for Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, whose support runs much stronger with women than men in general.

Only tonight’s vote counting will tell, of course, if that trend helps win the state for Vice President Harris.

Early voting wasn’t quite as big this year as in 2020 during the pandemic. But it was big enough that in the Peach State, today might be called an Election Day lite.

Over 4 million people had already voted before today, according to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. That left only 1.5 million to 2 million people left to vote on Election Day itself.

Ms. Harris may have a good shot at following in President Biden’s footsteps and winning Georgia. There are more active women voters than men in Georgia.

Mr. Trump’s hopes in this state lie with mobilizing “young good old boys who usually don’t vote,’’ says Charles Bullock, a veteran political scientist at the University of Georgia, in Athens.

The big nationwide gender gap may in part reflect this cycle’s focus on abortion rights, following the 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade. Another factor could be the Trump campaign’s emphasis on hypermasculinity in its pitch to voters.

Allison Richardson, a psychology major at Georgia College & State University in Milledgeville, Georgia, says she usually stays as far away from politics as she can. “We argue too much as a country as it is,” she says.

But despite seeing “two pretty bad choices” in this year’s presidential election, Ms. Richardson took the time to file an absentee ballot early for Kamala Harris.

Ms. Richardson, who hails from Spalding, Georgia, leans Democratic – her first ballot was cast for Sen. Raphael Warnock in 2022. She is torn on abortion rights. She says Georgia’s six-week limit on abortion is “too strict – someone might not even know they’re pregnant at that point.” But she also says states, under the federalist system, should have the right to decide their own rules around such critical issues.

In the end, it was less hot-button issues and more a sense of agency that drove her to vote.

“I have the right to vote, so I will, and given that this is a very close election I felt it as important that I should,” she says.

Not far away, outside an apartment building bedecked with Trump signs, potential Trump voter Nick Humphrey of Alpharetta, Georgia, is literally staying on the couch.

The 18-year-old is eligible to vote. He considers himself “right-wing,” – like many of his neighbors at the fraternity-like complex, with well-worn couches on the front porch he fits the Joe Rogan demographic. But despite podcaster Mr. Rogan’s endorsement of Mr. Trump, Mr. Humphrey, a marketing major, doesn’t plan to head out. With just two hours until polls close, he shakes his head. “Ain’t gonna happen,” he says.

He believes Mr. Trump is going to win Georgia, regardless of whether he casts a vote – a result he’d welcome.

“I just think I’ll be better off economically with a Trump presidency,” he says. “At this rate, when I graduate, I might as well give up on ever being able to buy a house.” Ms. Harris’ plan to help first-time homeowners with down payments is a pipe dream and too costly, he says. It’ll only drive up prices. And abortion? It’s already been settled by the Supreme Court.

The two young Georgians can’t be seen as representative. Yet their views and decisions in this battleground state could well play into who emerges victorious once the votes are counted.

Staff writer Linda Feldman contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Follow our 2024 Election coverage

With the high interest around Tuesday’s elections in the United States, we’ve decided to take down our paywall on all Election 2024 stories, so you can freely access reliable, trustworthy coverage. The paywall remains in effect on other stories.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In Georgia, women turn out to vote in force on Election Day. Why that matters.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2024/1105/election-women-gender-gap-georgia
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe