How Democrats’ campaign chair thinks they can still win the Senate

At the Monitor Breakfast, Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan said that he believed Democrats’ personal brands would prevail in Ohio and Montana – allowing his party to overcome an unusually difficult Senate map and maintain its majority. 

|
Troy Sambajon/The Christian Science Monitor
Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, spoke to reporters at a Monitor Breakfast at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington on Sept. 17, 2024.

The man charged with keeping Democrats in power in the Senate this election predicted that his party is on track to defy the odds and hang onto its narrow majority.

“I believe we’re going to hold the majority. I feel good about where we are,” Michigan Sen. Gary Peters, the chair of the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, told reporters at a breakfast hosted by The Christian Science Monitor Tuesday morning.

That’s a tall order.

Democrats currently have 51 Senate seats, meaning if they hold the White House this fall they can afford to lose just one – and West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin’s retirement all but guarantees they will be down a seat. (In the case of a 50-50 Senate, the vice president casts the tie-breaking vote.)

That means they likely need to sweep every other seat they currently hold, including winning in red states like Montana and Ohio, as well as battlegrounds in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Democrats are also eyeing potential pickup opportunities in Florida and Texas, though those states are uphill battles and have yet to see the level of financial investment from Democrats as the other races.

Mr. Peters said he expects many of the races to be neck-and-neck through Election Day.

“We’re basically where I thought we would be after Labor Day in really tight races,” he said. “And ultimately it’s going to be won on the margin.”

Democrats have held leads in the polls in most of the swing states, though public surveys indicate tightening races. Their toughest challenges, however, come in defending Montana Sen. Jon Tester and Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown.

Mr. Peters acknowledged that it’s not as easy as it once was for Senate candidates to win in states where the presidential race is breaking the other way – “getting ticket-splitters is harder than it used to be.” But he argued that the uniquely strong brands that Senators Tester and Brown have cultivated in their nearly two decades in office would help them survive this election cycle.

Senator Tester appears to be in worse shape right now, trailing narrowly in a few public and private polls, while Senator Brown has so far kept a lead in his race. 

Mr. Peters argued that Democrats could still hold the Senate even if Mr. Tester falls short, arguing that Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Rick Scott of Florida were both beatable. Public polls have shown both races are competitive. But the Republicans have consistently led – and those states are two of the most expensive in the nation to advertise in because of their numerous costly media markets. Mr. Peters pointed out that Democrats just put more money into field operations in both states, but they haven’t revealed any major TV reservations yet, which would be a sign that they are really playing to win in those states. 

Mr. Peters conceded that “you need to be on TV in a big way” and invest in other digital and social media to have a real shot at winning either race. He declined to commit his committee to doing so.

“Decisions as to what kind of resources will go in are going to be made real time and are likely to evolve,” he said. “Democrats are going to put more resources into those states if the momentum we’ve seen today continues. I’m certainly very encouraged.”

Mr. Peters pointed out that abortion referenda are on the ballot in both Montana and Texas, as well as in other states with Senate races like Arizona. Previous statewide referenda in purple and red states have spurred big surges in Democratic turnout and been approved by wide margins by voters, and Mr. Peters predicted that could help them win. 

“We expect that to be very powerful,” he said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How Democrats’ campaign chair thinks they can still win the Senate
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/monitor_breakfast/2024/0917/dscc-democrats-senate-ohio-montana
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe